How the United States can benefit from a graying
global population
The United States is getting
older. However, the rest of the world is
getting older faster. The “Great Powers”
that have dominated history over the past few centuries are quickly becoming
smaller and older. The United States has a demographic
trend which will allow it to maintain superiority over other countries over the
coming decades.
I recently read an article on the
Pacific Standard which argues that global ageing can actually work in the favor
of the United States
and ensure that its economic and military dominance can continue well into the
middle of the century. The United States
is getting older, but at a slower rate than many of the “near peer” competitors
around the world.
Germany |
France |
China |
Demographics are a danger to countries such as Japan and Russia which are seeing the greatest decrease in population, with Japan declining almost 20M and Russia 40M by 2050. In 2006, Russian President Vladimir Putin was quoted as saying that demographics are “Russia’s most acute problem today.” In a previous blog I explored the effects that an ageing population will have on Japan as well as the costs to society and the economy. Germany and France are following similar trends with a modest decrease in populations coupled with an over 65 age group of almost 30%
Population in 2013 | Population in 2050 | % of population over 65 | ||
Country | ||||
Russia | 143,300,000 | 104,258,000 | 27.96% | |
Germany | 81,726,000 | 70,805,000 | 28.75% | |
France | 65,436,552 | 61,832,000 | 29% | |
Japan | 127,520,000 | 109,220,000 | 35.10% | |
China | 1,347,350,000 | 1,462,058,000 | 24.10% | |
United States | 315,157,540 | 397,063,000 | 21.5% |
The population pyramids above give a good visual
representation of population trends going into the future. Most countries have already had their “youth
bulge” which gave a demographic dividend in the form of young people entering
the workforce. These youth bulges match
times when countries go through an economic boom due to the influx of human
capital into their populations. We saw
this in Japan
when its economy grew after the Second World War, and can see the after effects
with the current stagnant economic growth.
The United States
maintains a healthy base of young people who will enter the workforce in the
next few decades relative to its older population.
Japan |
Population changes can be attributed to fertility rates and
immigration policies. All industrialized
countries are experiencing lower fertility rates, but only the United States
has a healthy immigration policy to maintain its population. Japan,
Russia, and Europe have been
extremely resistant to immigration and we can see the rise of right wing parties
in Europe which will further prevent new
immigrants from joining their populations.
Developed countries around the
world would need to radically increase immigration policies or fertility rates
in order to reverse the trends we are predicting for 2050.
However, it is probably China which will see the most
dramatic ageing of its population. Many
people have often wondered if China
will become old before it becomes rich.
“...China’s
current independence ratio of 38 is unprecedentedly low. This represents the
number of dependents, children, and people over 65, per 100 working adults.
This implies that there are nearly twice as many working age people as the rest
of the entire population combined. This historically low dependency ratio has
been extremely beneficial for China’s
unprecedented period of economic growth. This dramatic shift was brought about
largely in part due to China’s
one-child policy. As a result China
is currently aging at an unprecedented rate. China
will be older than the United States
by 2020 and by Europe by 2030. Combined
with the sex-selective abortions widely practiced as a result of the one-child
policy– China will have 96.5 million men in their 20s in 2025 but only 80.3
million young women – China’s future demography holds many challenges for the
Communist party….” (Wikipedia)
Already there have been reports of labor shortages in China
to meet demand for workers and that wage inflation has begun to affect the
Chinese workforce. These would erode the
traditional competitive advantage of China for the past 30 years which
has been a low cost of labor.
Russia |
United States |
Experts believe that the ageing of the Chinese population
can lead to a 1% decrease in GDP growth per year until the 2020’s. It should also be stressed that China
is relatively poor compared to other developed countries, with a GDP per capita
of $5,417 vs. $48,328 in the United States, so it is indeed possible that China
will not be able to catch up fast enough to match the affluence of the US. China has also not saved enough for
the future, with an estimated 80% of households having less than one year of
income saved for the future.
The costs for ageing populations will be in the form of
increased health costs and increased taxes.
Health costs for seniors can run between 3 to 5 times that of the
younger population. Increases in taxes
would act as an economic drag on growth and investment.
The military advantage that the United States enjoys against the
rest of the world can be expected to increase as time goes by. At present, the Pentagon spends $664.84
billion per year (though there are probably going to be cutbacks during and
after 2013). This represents more than
the next 19 largest spending nations combined.
The age advantage of the United
States is an asset because more of the
defense budget can be spent on weapons procurement, technology, rather than
personnel and pensions. The US spends 1.15 more on personnel than weapons
purchases, compared to about 2.5 times more in France,
Japan, and Russia. The militaries of these countries would also
need to compete with the civilian economy to get skilled labor which could also
put stress on economic growth.
There is no doubt that the United States is experiencing great
challenges today. The economy is still
lurching forward after the economic crisis of 2013 and budget cuts can have a
great effect on American society. However,
there is no power which looks like it is on track to challenge the economic and
military supremacy that the US
has today.